Battleground Review Essay Research Paper Critical Review free essay sample

Battleground Review Essay, Research Paper Critical Review of Battleground In Battleground, Stephen Bates narrates the history of a tribunal instance in a little Tennessee town. The tribunal instance started with a female parent assisting her kid with a reading assignment. This female parent could non believe what she was reading. This female parent # 8217 ; s name was Vicki Frost, who was a place keeper. Frost went to the school and told the principal what she thought about the books. She believed that the books went against everything she taught her kids. She believed Satan wrote these books. She took her kids out of category during reading clip, from that point on. When the school told her that her kids would neglect if they didn # 8217 ; t go to category, Frost was astounded. After many conflicts with the local school, she took her instance to tribunal. The school said the books were appropriate for the kids to read, and if parents did non hold they could reassign their kids to another school. We will write a custom essay sample on Battleground Review Essay Research Paper Critical Review or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page Both sides had different organisations endorsing them. The instance gained national attending. The federal tribunal sided with the school territory in the terminal, but Vicki Frost did raise attending on how textbooks are chosen for our public schools. The book by Stephen Bates brings up a really controversial issue, should parents be able to command what their kids read in public schools. Bates does non knock either side during this book. Bates does a good occupation narrating the book giving good inside informations and allowing the reader make his/her ain determination. Vicki Frost is a parent who does non desire her childs reading books that contradict her households beliefs. Frost did the right thing by turn toing the school about this job. I could non make up ones mind which side I agree with while reading the book. Both sides made good statements against each other. Work forces who believed in God founded this state. # 8220 ; IN God WE Trust # 8221 ; is on federal belongings that we use mundane, but the school system sometimes learn something different. I agree with Frost that parents should command what public schools teach their kids. Parents pay revenue enhancements, which fund public schools and pay instructors wages. But public schools can non hold different categories for different faiths groups either. The Holts Books are like many other books ; people get different apprehensions of the books. Peoples think different, so people will interpret the significance of books otherwise. I besides have to hold with the school territory every bit good. Hawkins County has spent a batch of money on their educational system, and some lady with no college background is oppugning the system. I believe the school territory did non cognize what to believe of the state of affairs at first, but when a female parent starts drawing her kids out of category, # 8220 ; what can they make? # 8221 ; This would non be just if the school territory let the Frost kids skip category and still acquire recognition for the category. The school territory tal ked to Frost about everyday about the state of affairs. Neither side would alter their head during this clip. I believe that the suspension was a small extreme. I didn # 8217 ; Ts like how the school board handled the instance. The board did non desire a lady with no college instruction, to oppugn their opinion. The board should hold tried to work out this job with Mrs. Frost before it gained national attending. Mrs. Frost would non hold been satisfied with any of their suggestions, but they should hold treated her with a small regard. Bates references the New England Primer, which was the first widely, used text editions in America. The New England Primer used narratives from the Bible and about morality. But the separation of the Church and State put an terminal to this book. If public schools can non learn Christian values, they should non learn any other spiritual values. This was what Frost was seeking to do people understand. Her kids were reading narratives about Indians, Jews, Hindus, and other civilizations, but they could non larn about their ain civilization except at place or church. I believe the parents should learn their kids their ain values and beliefs at place. If kids read narratives about other kids rip offing, lying, stealing, or other unmoral things the kids should cognize the difference in right and incorrect. If the books teach inmoral principals and say that it is right, so this is where the books should be banned from public schools. It is unjust to a Christian kid to larn about other faiths in school, when he/she can non larn about their faith. This is what the federal system is seeking decide in the Frost instance. The Battleground brings out a really controversial issue. Should public school have the books approved by the parents and if parents don # 8217 ; t agree, should their kids be excused from the category. I truly wear # 8217 ; t cognize what side I truly agree with, because both sides have truly strong statements in their favour. I agree with public school can non learn about faith because of the 1st Amendment. The 1st Amendment provinces that faith should play no function in anything that is province supported. I besides believe that Christianity every bit good as other faith should hold no topographic point in public schools, unless it is student lead. My ground for this is that so many people have their ain beliefs, that if one faith is taught, the school is know aparting against the other faiths. I believe those good ethical motives and values should be taught at place, but they should non be taught at school. I believe that instructors should pattern utilizing good moral and val ues around pupils. This subject will ever be a controversial issue, because there is truly no right or incorrect to the Frost instance. If parents want their kids to acquire a good Christian instruction, their kids will hold to be place schooled or sent to a Christian school. I wish this wasn # 8217 ; t the instance, but of the 1st Amendment it must be this manner. Bibliography Work Cited Hrezo, Margaret. The Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion. Dec. 1990. Pg. 450 ( 1 ) Levinson, Sanford. Michigan Law Review. May 1994. Pgs. 1873-1892.